⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Kaotica IP Corp. v. Iconic Mars Corporation — Fed. Cir. (Nov 9, 2026)

No. 25-1883 Argued November 9, 2026 Published November 10, 2026

The Federal Circuit hears a dispute over a photograph attached to a trade-dress settlement. Kaotica accused Iconic Mars of violating its rights in a product’s appearance. The resulting judgment barred Iconic from selling the accused product, identified by an attached photo. Years later, Iconic asked to replace that photo, saying it showed a redesigned product rather than the version covered by the deal. Kaotica disputes that the photo is wrong. The district court refused to change the judgment. Iconic will argue that the rule for correcting clerical mistakes also covers a party’s drafting error. Kaotica will defend the signed agreement and argue that this is not a clerical correction.

Kaotica IP Corp. v. Iconic Mars Corporation (No. 25-1883) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, argued November 9, 2026.

Sources
Official Federal Circuit oral argument — November 9, 2026. Source note: the official file cuts off the judge’s final administrative word after ‘The case is submitted’; all advocacy is preserved, and no speech has been reconstructed.:https://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/oral-arguments/25-1883_11092026.mp3
District-court order denying judgment correction — Kaotica, Doc. 69, May 22, 2025:https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/california/casdce/3%3A2021cv00433/701844/69/0.pdf

0:00
0:00