Dines v. OCWR — Fed. Cir. (Nov 6, 2026)
The Federal Circuit hears a former Library of Congress employee's challenge to the rejection of his retaliation claim. The Library fired him, and he alleges that the dismissal was illegal reprisal. After a hearing, the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights ruled for the Library, and its board left that ruling in place. The board concluded that he had not shown the Library's stated non-retaliatory reasons were a cover for reprisal. It also acknowledged that close timing can help an employee make an initial retaliation case, but held that a possible error on that point did not change the result. His lawyer will challenge how the retaliation evidence and hearing procedures were treated. The agency will defend the ruling and argue that some objections were not raised at the proper stage. Listen for the difference between showing that an error occurred and showing that it affected the outcome.
Dines v. OCWR (No. 25-1657) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, argued November 6, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction