⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

UUSI, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. — Fed. Cir. (Nov 6, 2026)

No. 25-1640 Argued November 6, 2026 Published November 7, 2026

The Federal Circuit hears a dispute about the right to bring a touchscreen patent lawsuit. UUSI, doing business as Nartron, sued Samsung, alleging that certain Samsung tablets infringed its patent on electronic switching circuitry used in touchscreens. The complaint asserted that UUSI owned all rights in the patent and could recover damages for infringement. But Samsung challenged whether UUSI had acquired the patent interest needed to sue. The district court dismissed the case because it found that UUSI had no interest in the patent when the lawsuit began. That is the ruling behind this argument. The dispute therefore concerns who held the patent rights, rather than simply whether the accused tablets used the claimed technology. You will hear UUSI seek to overturn that dismissal and Samsung defend it. Keep the original infringement allegation separate from the ownership question: claiming that a product uses patented technology does not, by itself, resolve whether the person bringing the lawsuit holds the rights at issue.

UUSI, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (No. 25-1640) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, argued November 6, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — official Federal Circuit recording, November 6, 2026; complete original with routine volume and peak mastering only:https://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/oral-arguments/25-1640_11062026.mp3
Case and argument date — official Federal Circuit recording index, docket 25-1640:https://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/home/oral-argument/listen-to-oral-arguments/
Underlying tablet allegations and claimed ownership — UUSI's filed complaint, W.D. Michigan No. 1:15-cv-00146, Document 1, February 13, 2015, reproduced by RPX:https://insight.rpxcorp.com/litigation_documents/11170037
Reason for the challenged dismissal — Williams & Connolly, Samsung's litigation counsel, March 2025 first-party report; not a court opinion:https://www.wc.com/news/samsung-wins-dismissal-of-patent-suit/

0:00
0:00