⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Rayford v. Keeling — 9th Cir. (Aug 3, 2026)

No. 26-2279, 26-2280 & 26-2283 Argued August 3, 2026 Published August 4, 2026; updated August 21, 2026

The Ninth Circuit hears three consolidated appeals in a civil-rights suit brought by Juan Marshall Rayford and Dupree Antoine Glass. The men spent nearly seventeen years in prison after convictions arising from a 2004 shooting. A California court vacated their attempted-murder convictions in 2020, and they were later found factually innocent. They now allege that three Los Angeles County sheriff's deputies falsified evidence and failed to disclose favorable evidence. The deputies are appealing before trial after the district court denied qualified immunity, which shields officials from damages unless their conduct violated a clearly established constitutional right. The court must decide which claims, if any, can proceed against each deputy and whether the prosecutor's decision to charge breaks the chain of causation.

Rayford v. Keeling (No. 26-2279, 26-2280 & 26-2283) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued August 3, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/media/2026/08/03/26-2279.mp3
Argument listing — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/cases/streams-videos/archive?case=26-2279&hearingDate=2026-08-03
District-court calendar and qualified-immunity posture:https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/JpsApi/file/9c0354b1-c48d-4c72-4b4c-08dea17f3bf4
State habeas opinion — California Court of Appeal:https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B264402.PDF
Los Angeles County official statement — litigation disclosure:https://ttc.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2025-26-TRANS_Official-Statement.pdf
M. Anthony Brown — Adams, Duerk & Kamenstein:https://www.adkfirm.com/tony-brown
M. Anthony Brown — State Bar of California:https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/243848
Qualified immunity and immediate appeal — CRS:https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10486
Field-interview cards — California Department of Justice:https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/care-comm-briefing-slides-012125.pdf

0:00
0:00