⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Reach Community Development v. United States Department of Homeland Security — 9th Cir. (Jul 10, 2026)

No. 26-1575 Argued July 10, 2026 Published August 4, 2026; updated August 22, 2026

The Ninth Circuit reviews a preliminary injunction limiting federal officers' use of tear gas and other chemical munitions near Gray's Landing, an apartment building beside Portland's immigration facility. The plaintiffs are residents and the organizations that operate the building, not protesters outside the facility. They say repeated gas deployments entered their homes and bodies. The district court found a likely Fifth Amendment substantive due process violation and granted the injunction. A divided Ninth Circuit motions panel later stayed both the injunction and the district-court case. The merits panel must decide whether the plaintiffs also need to establish a fundamental right rooted in history, and what conduct can shock the conscience. Justice Department lawyer Brenna Scully will ask the court to vacate the injunction. Stephen Wirth of Jacobson Lawyers Group will argue that conscience-shocking executive conduct is the governing test and that the injunction should stand.

Reach Community Development v. United States Department of Homeland Security (No. 26-1575) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued July 10, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (public domain, 17 U.S.C. § 105):https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/media/2026/07/10/26-1575.mp3
Order staying the injunction — Ninth Circuit:https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/04/27/26-1575.pdf
Preliminary injunction order — U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon:https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/oregon/ordce/3%3A2025cv02257/190854/75/0.pdf
Stephen Wirth profile — Jacobson Lawyers Group:https://www.jacobsonlawyersgroup.com/about-us
Ninth Circuit opinion search:https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/

0:00
0:00