In re Gonzalez — 9th Cir. BAP (Oct 15, 2026)
Creditor Angela Arnone challenges Gerardo Gonzalez's bankruptcy discharge before the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Gonzalez entered bankruptcy owing Arnone a judgment debt. She challenged his reported household expenses and payments within his family, alleging that the financial picture he presented was dishonest. The bankruptcy court ruled for Gonzalez without a trial, leaving her debt covered by his discharge. A discharge releases the debtor from personal liability for covered debts, subject to statutory exceptions. Arnone represents herself and will argue that the court improperly accepted Gonzalez's explanations instead of allowing disputed questions of intent to be tried. Emily Thompson will defend the judgment as Gonzalez's lawyer. Section seven twenty-seven's false-oath provision requires a material false statement made knowingly and fraudulently in the bankruptcy case; an innocent mistake is not enough. Materiality concerns the statement's connection to the debtor's property or the administration of the bankruptcy estate. Summary judgment means deciding without a trial when there is no genuine dispute of material fact and the law entitles one side to win. Sua sponte means on the court's own initiative; Rule fifty-six permits that after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond. The three-forty-one meeting you will hear mentioned is the creditors' meeting, where the trustee questions the debtor.
In re Gonzalez (No. 26-1066) — U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit, argued October 15, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction