In re Pearlman — 9th Cir. BAP (Jul 16, 2026)
The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel considers creditor Peter Kleidman's appeal from an order partially overruling his objections to exemptions claimed by Chapter 7 debtor Jordan Pearlman, including an Apple Watch. The bankruptcy estate is the property administered in the case. Kleidman, representing himself, will contend that Section 362(h) removed the property from the estate after Pearlman filed a blank statement of intention, so the bankruptcy court could not exempt it. The panel later affirmed. It held that Section 362(h) did not apply because Pearlman scheduled no secured debt, and that the Apple Watch could qualify as exempt jewelry under California law.
In re Pearlman (No. 26-1051) — United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit, argued July 16, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction