Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Charles Eubanks v. Jeremy Bean, et al. — 9th Cir. (argued August 13, 2026)

No. 25-973 Argued August 13, 2026 Published August 13, 2026; updated August 18, 2026

Charles Eubanks asks the Ninth Circuit to reverse the denial of four claims in his federal habeas case challenging Nevada murder, attempted-murder, and attempted-robbery convictions. Federal habeas lets a state prisoner challenge custody that violates federal law. Eubanks says prosecutors withheld evidence that could impeach jailhouse witnesses and his lawyers mishandled plea offers, accomplice liability, and sentencing. Under Brady, prosecutors must disclose favorable evidence when its suppression could affect the result. Nevada says the witnesses were already heavily impeached, the remaining evidence was strong, and Eubanks cannot overcome procedural bars or show prejudice.

Charles Eubanks v. Jeremy Bean, et al. (No. 25-973) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued August 13, 2026.

0:00
0:00