Munoz v. Alorica, Inc. — 9th Cir. (Jul 10, 2026)
The Ninth Circuit reviews class certification in an ERISA lawsuit over Alorica's 401(k) plan. Former participants say the plan offered imprudent investments and paid excessive recordkeeping fees. The defendants argue that the named plaintiffs cannot represent participants who chose other funds and that the proposed fee model would harm some class members. On July 30, 2026, the panel held that the plaintiffs had standing but vacated certification because the district court had not rigorously analyzed typicality or a possible conflict within the class. It remanded without deciding whether any class should ultimately be certified.
Munoz v. Alorica, Inc. (No. 25-7359) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued July 10, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 0:48Advocate — Mike Prame
- 4:04Rule 23
- 11:22Advocate — Christina Humphrey