Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

United Cook Inlet Drift Association, et al. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al. — 9th Cir. (argued August 10, 2026)

No. 25-5523 Argued August 10, 2026 Published August 12, 2026; updated August 17, 2026

The Ninth Circuit returns to a long-running dispute over commercial salmon fishing in Alaska's Cook Inlet. The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires federal plans for fisheries that need conservation and management. Amendment Sixteen creates a plan for salmon harvest in federal offshore waters, while Alaska regulates state waters. Because the salmon cross that line, two fishing groups say the Act's definition of a fishery requires the plan to account for all fishing on the stocks. They also challenge the plan's harvest-yield calculations and scientific basis. The Fisheries Service says its authority stops at federal waters and joint management was impracticable after Alaska declined to participate. The district court upheld the amendment; the groups appeal.

United Cook Inlet Drift Association, et al. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al. (No. 25-5523) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued August 10, 2026.

0:00
0:00