⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Sheet Metal Workers Local 16 v. Brawn Mechanical — 9th Cir. (Oct 28, 2026)

No. 25-4867 Argued October 28, 2026 Published October 29, 2026

A company's attempt to end its union contract leads to a fight about who decides whether that contract still applies. Brawn Mechanical and Local Sixteen were parties to a collective bargaining agreement, or CBA: their union contract. The company sent notice saying it would end the agreement on June thirtieth. It then used nonunion workers, and the union filed a grievance, a formal complaint under the contract. The union said an automatic-renewal clause kept the agreement in force. An arbitration board agreed that the contract remained binding during the disputed period. A federal judge confirmed its award, and the company appealed. Repudiation means rejecting obligations under a contract; whether that actually ended this agreement is disputed. Arbitrability asks whether the parties agreed to have this dispute decided through arbitration. Michael Cox, for the company, will argue that the court had to decide whether the union filed a timely grievance before deferring to the arbitrators.

Sheet Metal Workers Local 16 v. Brawn Mechanical (No. 25-4867) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued October 28, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — official Ninth Circuit original, October 28, 2026:https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/media/2026/10/28/25-4867.mp3
Official Seattle argument calendar and appeal synopsis:https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/cases/calendar/calendar-week/?date=2026-10-28&loc=SE
Contract, letters, grievance, arbitration award and challenged ruling — June 11, 2025 district opinion, Document 30:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ord-3_24-cv-01219/pdf/USCOURTS-ord-3_24-cv-01219-0.pdf
Judgment chronology and union counsel identification — later fee ruling, Document 41:https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/oregon/ordce/3%3A2024cv01219/181065/41/0.pdf
Separate decertification chronology — original NLRB case 19-RD-325708:https://www.nlrb.gov/case/19-RD-325708
Federal labor-contract suits — LMRA § 301 / 29 U.S.C. § 185:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/185
Appeal and counsel appearances — public docket:https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-4867
Andrew Toney-Noland — current McKanna Bishop Joffe, LLP profile:https://mbjlaw.com/attorneys/andrew-toney-noland/

0:00
0:00