Tallman v. Spencer — 9th Cir. (argued September 15, 2026)
The Ninth Circuit hears Jonathan Tallman's defamation appeal against Dillon Spencer. Tallman owns a coffee shop in Boardman, Oregon, coached youth soccer, and unsuccessfully ran for four local offices from 2020 through 2023. A former teenage employee alleged that Tallman touched her and behaved sexually toward her while she worked at the shop; police investigated, but Tallman was never charged. In August 2023, after the former employee shared the police report on Facebook, her stepbrother Spencer posted that Tallman was a predator who had victimized children and had multiple victims. Tallman says those statements are false and sued for defamation and false light. The district court treated Tallman as a public figure, required him to plausibly allege actual malice, and ultimately dismissed the case with prejudice. The appeal asks whether a recent former candidate remains a public figure, and whether the court drew improper inferences against Tallman under Oregon's anti-SLAPP procedure.
Tallman v. Spencer (No. 25-4506) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued September 15, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:25Joshua Escovedo — Jonathan Tallman
- 2:40Oregon's anti-SLAPP procedure
- 16:34Clifford Davidson — Dillon Spencer