Stewart v. City of Tacoma — 9th Cir. (Aug 5, 2026)
The Ninth Circuit considers whether Tacoma itself can be liable after police seized and destroyed industrial hemp they believed was marijuana. Aaron Stewart and Tierra Harvest say the city had a custom of destroying suspected contraband without testing, notice, or a hearing. Tacoma says one discretionary incident is not a municipal policy and that state regulations allowed the destruction. Under Monell, a city is liable only when its own policy or custom causes a constitutional violation. The panel later affirmed the judgment for Tacoma, holding that Stewart had not established municipal liability.
Stewart v. City of Tacoma (No. 25-4271) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued August 5, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 0:47Robert L. Sirianni Jr.
- 4:05Rule 30(b)(6)
- 10:11Michelle Yotter