⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Klawonn v. Board of Directors for the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plans — 9th Cir. (Jul 10, 2026)

No. 25-2874, 25-3230 Argued July 10, 2026 Published August 4, 2026; updated August 22, 2026

The Ninth Circuit considers cross-appeals over how the Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan was invested. Patricia Klawonn says the board breached its duty of prudence under ERISA, the federal pension law, and caused losses. The board says its process was reasonable and the district court correctly ended the case without a trial; it also conditionally challenges class certification. Brock Specht of Nichols Kaster will argue for Klawonn. Joshua Yount of Mayer Brown will argue for the board. The panel later vacated the judgment and sent the case back to apply its newer Anderson decision and ERISA's ‘any loss’ language. It also held that the class may continue if the district court finds a replacement representative.

Klawonn v. Board of Directors for the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plans (No. 25-2874, 25-3230) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued July 10, 2026.

0:00
0:00