⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Boermeester v. University of Southern California, et al. — 9th Cir. (Oct 29, 2026)

No. 25-2332 Argued October 29, 2026 Published October 30, 2026

The Ninth Circuit considers whether Matthew Boermeester can pursue federal claims over his expulsion from USC. The university investigated a 2017 incident in which witnesses reported that he grabbed a woman by the neck and pushed her against a wall. He disputes the abuse finding, and the woman later denied abuse, but USC expelled him for intimate partner violence. His challenge to the school decision ultimately failed in California courts; a federal judge also dismissed his related civil rights claims. Those claims include Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded education. The question now is whether the earlier proceedings bar his federal lawsuit. Judicial exhaustion here asks whether he had to get a court order overturning the school decision before pursuing those claims.

Boermeester v. University of Southern California, et al. (No. 25-2332) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued October 29, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — official Ninth Circuit recording, October 29, 2026:https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/media/2026/10/29/25-2332.mp3
Official Ninth Circuit calendar — October 29, Pasadena, Title IX and section 1983 dismissal appeal:https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calendar/
Current appeal identity and counsel — appellate docket:https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-2332
School incident and fair-procedure review — California Supreme Court opinion, July 31, 2023:https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S263180.PDF
Prior state-court judgment after remand — March 7, 2024 opinion and March 8 modification:https://courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B290675N.PDF
Title IX — 20 U.S.C. section 1681:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1681
Title IX prohibition — Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, majority section II, page 638:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/629/
Judicial exhaustion — Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior Court, operative opinion:https://openjurist.org/17/cal3d/465/westlake-community-hospital-v-superior-court-1175714

0:00
0:00