Patterson v. Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc. — 9th Cir. (Jul 8, 2026)
The Ninth Circuit considers whether a federal judge went too far in monitoring Six Flags' compliance with an injunction protecting a deaf patron. After a bench trial, the judge found that Six Flags had violated federal and California disability-access laws. The appeal concerns three monitoring provisions: quarterly reports, three years of court oversight, and access to specified records. After this argument, the Ninth Circuit upheld those provisions in an unpublished memorandum.
Patterson v. Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc. (No. 25-2070) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued July 8, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 0:34Advocate — Sanaz Cherazaie
- 16:19Advocate — Andrew Rozynski
- 31:20Rule 60(b)(5)