Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

City of Fernley v. Conant — 9th Cir. (argued August 12, 2026)

No. 25-1776 Argued August 12, 2026 Published August 14, 2026; updated August 18, 2026

The Ninth Circuit revisits a fight over the Bureau of Reclamation's plan to partially line the Truckee Canal. The National Environmental Policy Act requires a federal agency to study and disclose major environmental effects, alternatives, and mitigation, but it does not force the agency to choose a particular result. Fernley and two well owners say the lining will reduce seepage that recharges the area's aquifer and that the review was inadequate. The federal defendants say Reclamation considered the choices reasonably and that courts owe its scientific judgments substantial deference.

City of Fernley v. Conant (No. 25-1776) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued August 12, 2026.

0:00
0:00