Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Johnson v. Adgar — 9th Cir. (argued July 9, 2026)

No. 25-1392 Argued July 9, 2026 Published July 10, 2026; updated August 17, 2026

The Ninth Circuit reviews a civil-rights verdict from a 2020 protest in San Jose. A jury found that Officer James Adgar fired a foam baton round that struck Kyle Johnson, who had not thrown anything at police, and awarded Johnson about one point four million dollars. After the district court preserved Johnson's Fourth Amendment and California Bane Act claims, Adgar appealed. The appeal asks whether the shot was a constitutional seizure, whether the force was unreasonable, and whether existing law gave Adgar fair notice. The court will also consider whether the Bane Act's clearly delineated standard matches qualified immunity's clearly established test.

Johnson v. Adgar (No. 25-1392) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued July 9, 2026.

0:00
0:00