⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Smith v. Baca, et al. — 9th Cir. (Oct 29, 2026)

No. 24-7816 Argued October 29, 2026 Published October 30, 2026

The Ninth Circuit hears a Nevada prisoner's lawsuit over exposure to COVID-19. He sued prison officials, alleging that they knowingly moved infected prisoners into his housing unit and caused him to contract COVID. The district court refused to end the case without trial, finding a genuine factual dispute over whether officials responded reasonably to the danger. The officials have appealed the denial of qualified immunity. That doctrine protects individual officials from damages unless they violated a constitutional right that was clearly established at the time. This is an interlocutory appeal, meaning an appeal before the trial-court proceedings are finished. Such an appeal can address legal immunity questions, but generally cannot be used simply to reweigh evidence about disputed events. Recording note: The court's original file cuts off during the judge's closing, after both sides finish and the case is submitted. That original cutoff is preserved.

Smith v. Baca, et al. (No. 24-7816) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued October 29, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — official Ninth Circuit recording, October 29, 2026:https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/media/2026/10/29/24-7816.mp3
COVID-exposure allegations and denial of summary judgment — district court Doc. 44, November 20, 2024:https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/nevada/nvdce/3%3A2022cv00522/159607/44/0.pdf
Legal versus factual issues in an immediate immunity appeal — Supreme Court Johnson v. Jones majority:https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/515/304

0:00
0:00