United States v. Barber — 9th Cir. (Sep 14, 2026)
The Ninth Circuit hears Brett Barber's appeal after he pleaded guilty in a real-estate investment fraud case and received a 181-month prison sentence. Barber and a business partner promised returns from house-flipping investments; federal prosecutors and securities regulators say the operation raised millions while much of the money never funded those deals. This appeal focuses on his unsuccessful attempt to withdraw his guilty plea before sentencing. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure eleven D two B allows withdrawal at that stage if the defendant shows a fair and just reason. Barber's lawyer will argue that advice about a possible life sentence made the plea involuntary, and that the judge should have heard testimony before rejecting his account. The panel will ask whether that is really ineffective assistance of counsel—a Sixth Amendment claim better developed in a later Section 2255 motion than on direct appeal. Barber also challenges the difference between his 181-month sentence and his co-schemer's probation.
United States v. Barber (No. 24-7474) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, argued September 14, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 13:31Advocate — Melissa Rabbani