⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

O'Hara v. Lott — 8th Cir. (Sep 24, 2026)

No. 25-2897 Argued September 24, 2026 Published September 26, 2026

Police found Omar O'Hara asleep in his car in University City, Missouri. Dispatch said his license was revoked; a state court had stayed it. Sergeant Terrence Lott moved to arrest him; O'Hara crossed his arms and asked why. Lott used a Taser, and a struggle followed; the parties dispute whether O'Hara grabbed it or resisted. O'Hara sued Lott and Officer Marlissa Butler-Cherry over the arrest, force, and her alleged failure to intervene. The district court found key facts disputed and refused to end the case before trial. The officers appealed the denial of qualified immunity, which shields officers from damages unless they violate clearly established law. They also claim arguable probable cause: a reasonable officer could have believed there were grounds to arrest, even if mistaken. The judges will examine the video, the initial Taser use, and the grounds for arrest.

O'Hara v. Lott (No. 25-2897) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, argued September 24, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (public domain, 17 U.S.C. § 105):https://media-oa.ca8.uscourts.gov/OAaudio/2026/9/252897.mp3
District court order and case background — Eastern District of Missouri:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-moed-4_23-cv-00442/pdf/USCOURTS-moed-4_23-cv-00442-0.pdf
Timothy Reichardt — Reichardt Noce & Young:https://www.rnylaw.com/tim-reichardt
Arguable probable cause — Eighth Circuit opinion:https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/22/07/211552P.pdf

0:00
0:00