⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Olga Diaz v. James C. Schmidt — 7th Cir. (Oct 30, 2026)

No. 26-1507 Argued October 30, 2026 Published October 30, 2026

The Seventh Circuit hears a retaliation suit by a former vice chancellor at a Wisconsin public university. She says the chancellor fired her after she refused to press a coworker to drop a racial-discrimination complaint and assisted investigators. The district judge dismissed her claims on sovereign-immunity grounds without deciding whether retaliation occurred. Sovereign immunity generally protects states from being sued in federal court. But she sued the chancellor personally, seeking damages for alleged violations of federal rights. Her lawyer will argue that the case holds him personally responsible, rather than making the state pay. His lawyer will argue that this employment dispute is really a claim against the state. You will hear the term public fisc: that means the state treasury. The panel must decide whether immunity blocks the case before its merits can be heard.

Olga Diaz v. James C. Schmidt (No. 26-1507) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, argued October 30, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — official Seventh Circuit recording:https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/external/nv.26-1507.26-1507_10_30_2026.mp3
Case and argument date — official Seventh Circuit audio listing:https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/oralArguments/oar.jsp?amonth=10%2F2026&aMonth=List+case%28s%29
Case background and immunity dismissal — district court opinion and order, February 20, 2026, document 73:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-wiwd-3_24-cv-00161/pdf/USCOURTS-wiwd-3_24-cv-00161-0.pdf
Equal contractual rights — 42 U.S.C. § 1981:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1981
Civil-rights remedy against state officials — 42 U.S.C. § 1983:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983
Personal versus official capacity and state immunity — Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991):https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/502/21

0:00
0:00