⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

A.R.M.R. v. USA — 7th Cir. (Sep 29, 2026)

No. 26-1218 Argued September 29, 2026 Published September 30, 2026

The Seventh Circuit hears a case arising from the first weeks of the pandemic. In March 2020, a pregnant woman entered the United States intending to seek asylum. She gave birth to a daughter here. Federal border officers then expelled the family to Mexico under a public-health order. The mother and her U.S.-citizen daughter sued the United States, alleging wrongful detention and expulsion. A district judge dismissed their claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act's quarantine exception. Does a policy of suspending entry and expelling people count as a quarantine, including for a child born in the United States?

A.R.M.R. v. USA (No. 26-1218) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, argued September 29, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — Seventh Circuit (public domain, 17 U.S.C. § 105):https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/external/gw.26-1218.26-1218_09_29_2026.mp3
Case history and dismissal order — U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ilsd-3_24-cv-02416/pdf/USCOURTS-ilsd-3_24-cv-02416-0.pdf
Federal tort claims against the United States — 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b):https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title%3A28+section%3A1346%28b%29+edition%3Aprelim%29
Appeal docket and advocate appearances — Seventh Circuit:https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca7/26-1218

0:00
0:00