⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Richard Stanley, Jr. v. Brown County Election Board — 7th Cir. (Sep 25, 2026)

No. 26-1186 Argued September 25, 2026 Published October 4, 2026

The Seventh Circuit hears a dispute over Republican primary-ballot access in Brown County, Indiana. Richard Stanley and Tim Clark complained to the Indiana Republican Party about their local chairman. The party rejected the complaint and declared both men not Republicans in good standing for five years. They dispute the party's allegations and say the county election board cannot constitutionally enforce that decision against their candidacies. They sued the board before it decided whether to exclude them. The federal district court found the threatened exclusion concrete enough for judicial review, but dismissed their claims under an earlier decision called Hero. They now appeal. The judges will consider whether the lawsuit was premature and whether the party's right to choose its candidates permits the board to enforce this ban. Hero involved another Indiana candidate removed from a Republican primary ballot after a party ban.

Richard Stanley, Jr. v. Brown County Election Board (No. 26-1186) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, argued September 25, 2026.

0:00
0:00