Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

RK Holdings LLP v. Seth Grebbien — 7th Cir. (argued September 11, 2026)

No. 25-3226 Argued September 11, 2026 Published September 12, 2026

The Seventh Circuit hears Rural King's appeal. The dispute began when Seth Grebbien filed a proposed warranty class action against Rural King in Pennsylvania state court under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Rural King then filed in federal court in Illinois to enforce an arbitration clause. The judge denied its petition for lack of jurisdiction because Grebbien was the sole named plaintiff and Magnuson-Moss's federal-court provision requires at least one hundred named plaintiffs in a class action. Rural King says the Class Action Fairness Act supplies a separate route to federal court. Grebbien says it does not.

RK Holdings LLP v. Seth Grebbien (No. 25-3226) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, argued September 11, 2026.

0:00
0:00