⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

Carmen Martinez v. City of Hammond, Indiana — 7th Cir. (Nov 9, 2026)

No. 25-3066 Argued November 9, 2026 Published November 10, 2026

The Seventh Circuit reviews the dismissal of a Hammond police sergeant’s discrimination lawsuit. Martinez says the department ridiculed her after she sought treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder. She says a fitness-for-duty evaluation led to administrative leave and removal from her traffic assignment. She also alleges sexual harassment and retaliation after she complained. A federal judge found her complaint insufficient and refused a further amendment. Martinez will argue that the judge demanded too much detail before discovery and should have allowed her to revise the complaint. The city will argue that her account of past grievances does not plausibly connect the facts to the legal claims.

Carmen Martinez v. City of Hammond, Indiana (No. 25-3066) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, argued November 9, 2026.

Sources
Official Seventh Circuit oral argument — November 9, 2026:https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/external/ch.25-3066.25-3066_11_09_2026.mp3
District-court opinion and order — Martinez, October 17, 2025:https://app.midpage.ai/document/carmen-martinez-v-hammond-city-11174240

0:00
0:00