⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

USA v. Glenn Bowden — 7th Cir. (Oct 6, 2026)

No. 25-2297 Argued October 6, 2026 Published October 10, 2026

The Seventh Circuit hears Glenn Bowden's sentencing appeal. Bowden has an earlier federal robbery sentence. This appeal concerns a separate eighty-seven-month sentence on three counts, including false statements. The false-statement count involved denying the other conduct investigators were looking into. The dispute centers on a sentencing cross-reference: a rule directing the court to another offense's guideline when the count establishes that other offense. The court also considers waiver: intentionally giving up an objection is different from simply failing to raise it.

USA v. Glenn Bowden (No. 25-2297) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, argued October 6, 2026.

Sources
Argument date and case identity — Seventh Circuit recordings:https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/oralArguments/oar.jsp?amonth=10%2F2026&aMonth=List+case%28s%29
Earlier robbery sentence only — District court opinion,24-cv-04528 Doc16:https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/illinois/ilndce/1%3A2024cv04528/459611/16/
False-statement allegations — Filed indictment,24-cr-143 Doc1:https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndil/media/1344421/dl?inline=
Sentencing cross-reference mechanism — USSC section2B1.1(c)(3):https://www.ussc.gov/guidelines/2025-guidelines-manual/annotated-2025-chapter-2-c

0:00
0:00