United States v. Ilija Ristik — 7th Cir. (Sep 29, 2026)
Federal prosecutors accused trucking-company owner Ilija Ristik of paying a transportation executive to steer business to his companies. They charged honest-services wire fraud, alleging the payments deprived the executive's employer of his loyal service. Ristik says he was an FBI cooperator whose handling agent authorized the conduct—a public-authority defense. That agent, Michael Mangan, invoked the Fifth Amendment and did not testify; prosecutors declined to grant him immunity. After his conviction, Ristik says the absence of that witness unfairly tilted his trial, especially because other FBI agents testified about the supposed authorization. Alex Little of Litson represents Ristik and will ask the Seventh Circuit for a new trial.
United States v. Ilija Ristik (No. 25-1987) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, argued September 29, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 10:10Advocate — Michelle Parthum