⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

USA v. Andrew Anania — 7th Cir. (Sep 28, 2026)

No. 25-1876 Argued September 28, 2026 Published September 28, 2026

Two women driving cars were kidnapped in separate incidents near Chicago in March 2021. In the first, Andrew Anania forced an Uber driver to drive at gunpoint and sexually assaulted her. Two days later, he and another man abducted a second driver and took her car. A federal jury convicted Anania of kidnapping, carjacking, and a firearm offense, and a judge sentenced him to fifty years in prison. On appeal, his lawyer argues that charges from the two incidents should not have been tried together. Federal Criminal Rule Eight allows charges of the same or similar character in one case; Rule Fourteen permits separate trials if joining charges would be prejudicial. The question here is whether the two kidnappings were similar enough for one trial, and whether evidence about the first unfairly affected the jury's verdict on the second.

USA v. Andrew Anania (No. 25-1876) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, argued September 28, 2026.

0:00
0:00