⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

O. E. v. Advocates for Arts-Based Education — 5th Cir. (Nov 4, 2026)

No. 26-30174 Argued November 4, 2026 Published November 5, 2026

The Fifth Circuit hears a dispute over access to a New Orleans public charter school. O E, a child with profound intellectual and physical disabilities, applied to the Willow School. His parents asked it to waive the reading and math assessment, saying his disability made the required score unattainable. Willow offered testing accommodations, including extra time and a quiet room, but would not waive the assessment. He took it, did not reach the eligibility threshold, and was not eligible for admission. His family sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the federal special-education law. The district court dismissed the federal claims at the pleading stage and denied a preliminary injunction against the testing rule. O E now appeals. The dispute is about this particular school's duties, not whether children with disabilities have a right to public education. The parties agree he is receiving special-education services at another public school, but disagree about whether that answers his claim against Willow. O E will argue that equal access requires a waiver when other testing accommodations cannot overcome the disability. He will also argue that Willow's status as its own local educational agency creates obligations before enrollment. Willow will answer that academic readiness is an essential part of its selective program, and that federal law does not require it to eliminate that requirement. It will argue that its special-education obligations attach when a student is placed there, with the parish school board responsible otherwise. Listen for two separate questions: whether a school must change an admissions rule under disability-discrimination law, and which agency owes the child special-education services. Those questions overlap, but they are not interchangeable, and the judges' hypotheticals are not rulings.

O. E. v. Advocates for Arts-Based Education (No. 26-30174) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, argued November 4, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — official Fifth Circuit recording; complete advocacy and submission retained; following case's administrative lead-in omitted:https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/OralArgRecordings/26/26-30174_11-04-2026.mp3
Application, testing accommodations, case history and prior dismissal/injunction decision — E.D. La. Doc 72, Mar 17, 2026; pleaded allegations and provisional findings distinguished, not this appeal's outcome:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-laed-2_25-cv-01054/pdf/USCOURTS-laed-2_25-cv-01054-1.pdf

0:00
0:00