Chavez Law v. Depositors Insurance — 5th Cir. (Aug 6, 2026)
The Fifth Circuit considers whether a discharged personal-injury law firm can recover a claimed contingency-fee interest directly from the opposing party’s insurer. Chavez Law says Depositors paid its former client, Alejandro Soto, the entire settlement despite notice that the firm claimed forty percent. The district court dismissed the suit, holding that under Texas law the firm’s remedy ordinarily lies against its former client unless it pleads a conspiracy. Kurt Howard Kuhn of Kuhn Law will argue for Chavez Law that its assigned fee was a property interest Depositors could not ignore after notice. Patrick M. Kemp of Segal McCambridge will argue for Depositors that Texas law allows no direct claim against the insurer and the dismissal should stand.
Chavez Law v. Depositors Insurance (No. 25-50900) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, argued August 6, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction