United States v. Madrid — 5th Cir. (Jul 8, 2026)
The Fifth Circuit hears United States versus Madrid. Anthony Madrid pleaded guilty to drug trafficking and to discharging a firearm during that crime, adding a mandatory ten-year consecutive sentence under Section 924(c). Through Section 2255, the federal procedure for challenging a conviction or sentence, he says that firearm conviction violates the Second Amendment because he fired to defend his home and family from masked men collecting a drug debt. The court must also decide whether the claim came too late or was waived in his plea agreement. Damonta Morgan of Forman Watkins represents Madrid. He will ask the court to reach the claim and vacate the firearm conviction. Assistant United States Attorney Bradley Visosky represents the government. He will contend that the procedural bars control and that the Second Amendment does not protect a firearm used during drug trafficking.
United States v. Madrid (No. 25-40161) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, argued July 8, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction