United States v. Simpson — 5th Cir. (argued August 5, 2026)
The Fifth Circuit reviews bank-fraud convictions arising from a check-kiting scheme, moving checks among accounts to create artificial balances before they clear. Charlie Simpson and Charles Gardner worked for two northern Louisiana home-health companies. A jury convicted both of conspiracy and Simpson of four bank-fraud counts. Gardner says salary and bonus evidence let prosecutors blur motive with the object of the fraud, and the judge should have limited how jurors used it. Simpson says the judge admitted his messages to prove intent but excluded messages and banking-history evidence supporting his defense. The government says jurors received the correct law, the challenged evidence was limited, and the proof of fraud was overwhelming.
United States v. Simpson (No. 25-30580) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, argued August 5, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:00Sara Johnson for Charles Gardner
- 1:46Motion in limine
- 12:35Elizabeth Franklin-Best for Charlie Simpson
- 14:47The coconspirator rule
- 18:46Tory Roberts for the United States
- 29:12Preserving excluded evidence