Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

United States v. Simpson — 5th Cir. (argued August 5, 2026)

No. 25-30580 Argued August 5, 2026 Published August 12, 2026; updated August 17, 2026

The Fifth Circuit reviews bank-fraud convictions arising from a check-kiting scheme, moving checks among accounts to create artificial balances before they clear. Charlie Simpson and Charles Gardner worked for two northern Louisiana home-health companies. A jury convicted both of conspiracy and Simpson of four bank-fraud counts. Gardner says salary and bonus evidence let prosecutors blur motive with the object of the fraud, and the judge should have limited how jurors used it. Simpson says the judge admitted his messages to prove intent but excluded messages and banking-history evidence supporting his defense. The government says jurors received the correct law, the challenged evidence was limited, and the proof of fraud was overwhelming.

United States v. Simpson (No. 25-30580) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, argued August 5, 2026.

0:00
0:00