⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

United States v. Gibson — 5th Cir. (Jul 8, 2026)

No. 25-30445 Argued July 8, 2026 Published July 10, 2026; updated August 20, 2026

The Fifth Circuit hears United States versus Gibson. A jury convicted Cody Gibson of joining a conspiracy involving five grams or more of methamphetamine. Gibson will accept that the evidence showed a drug conspiracy but contend that the government did not prove his transactions involved methamphetamine. The United States will answer that intercepted calls and surveillance allowed that inference. The court must decide whether the circumstantial proof was sufficient and, if not, what that means for Gibson's conviction and sentence.

United States v. Gibson (No. 25-30445) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, argued July 8, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (public domain, 17 U.S.C. § 105):https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/OralArgRecordings/25/25-30445_07-08-2026.mp3
Argument listing — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit:https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/oral-argument-recordings/results?from=2026-07-08&to=2026-07-08
Argument calendar — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit:https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/court-calendars/sitting?d=2026-07-08

0:00
0:00