USA v. Truong — 5th Cir. (Oct 6, 2026)
A Houston pharmacist challenges convictions for unlawfully dispensing prescription painkillers. Hieu Truong worked at S and S Pharmacy, where prosecutors said forged prescriptions were used to obtain controlled drugs. His first trial in 2022 ended with an acquittal on conspiracy but convictions on three dispensing counts. Then the Supreme Court decided Ruan, addressing what prosecutors must prove about a medical practitioner's knowledge that the dispensing was unauthorized. The district court found that Truong's original jury instructions had not required that subjective mental state and ordered a new trial. He was convicted again after the retrial, and this appeal challenges both the evidence and the instructions given to that jury. The central dispute is whether he actually knew the prescriptions were unauthorized, not simply whether a reasonable pharmacist should have spotted warning signs. Beau Brindley represents Truong and will ask the court to overturn the convictions.
USA v. Truong (No. 25-20331) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, argued October 6, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 14:29Advocate — William Clayman