Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Ins — 5th Cir. (Sep 24, 2026)
Aramark funded employee health plans and hired Aetna to handle medical claims. Aramark alleges that Aetna paid improper claims and collected fees it should not have received. Aetna wants the dispute in arbitration, but their contract excludes claims for equitable relief. A Texas judge declined to halt the lawsuit for arbitration. The Fifth Circuit is now hearing the case en banc, after vacating an earlier three-judge opinion. The judges must decide who applies the contract's exception, and whether the money Aramark seeks is an equitable remedy or ordinary damages. Charles McCloud will argue for Aetna that the claim belongs in arbitration.
Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Ins (No. 24-40323) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, argued September 24, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 3:17Fiduciary surcharge
- 9:41Two ERISA remedies
- 15:08What is dicta?
- 26:35Advocate — Charles Fowler
- 46:46Advocate — Jonathan Berry