⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Ins — 5th Cir. (Sep 24, 2026)

No. 24-40323 Argued September 24, 2026 Published September 27, 2026

Aramark funded employee health plans and hired Aetna to handle medical claims. Aramark alleges that Aetna paid improper claims and collected fees it should not have received. Aetna wants the dispute in arbitration, but their contract excludes claims for equitable relief. A Texas judge declined to halt the lawsuit for arbitration. The Fifth Circuit is now hearing the case en banc, after vacating an earlier three-judge opinion. The judges must decide who applies the contract's exception, and whether the money Aramark seeks is an equitable remedy or ordinary damages. Charles McCloud will argue for Aetna that the claim belongs in arbitration.

Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Ins (No. 24-40323) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, argued September 24, 2026.

0:00
0:00