John Mullins v. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association — 4th Cir. (Oct 30, 2026)
The Fourth Circuit hears a dispute over fees in a 401(k) retirement plan. Participants accuse the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and its plan committee of charging excessive administrative fees. They sue under ERISA, the federal employee-benefits law. A district judge certified a class, and the association is challenging that decision. Certification allows representatives to litigate for the group; it is not a finding that the fees were excessive. The association will argue that different accounts, fees, and services require individual proof of harm. The participants will argue that the fees were excessive at the plan level, and individual differences concern how damages are distributed. Commonality asks whether there are questions common to the class. Predominance goes further: under Rule twenty-three, b three, common questions must outweigh those requiring individual answers.
John Mullins v. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (No. 26-1823) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, argued October 30, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction