⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

United States v. Maximo Zacarias — 4th Cir. (Sep 18, 2026)

No. 25-4242 Argued September 18, 2026 Published September 29, 2026

The Coast Guard stopped a boat in the eastern Pacific and found a large shipment of marijuana. A Virginia jury convicted two crew members, Maximo Zacarias and Bernacio Solares Ramon, and each received ten years in prison. The government says the boat had no nationality, a status that brings it within the U.S. maritime drug law. That law says a judge, not the jury, decides the vessel-jurisdiction question. The men argue that the Constitution required a jury finding beyond a reasonable doubt, and that prosecuting them also required a connection, or nexus, to the United States. The government disputes both points. The appeal also asks whether any jury-instruction error could have changed the verdict.

United States v. Maximo Zacarias (No. 25-4242) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, argued September 18, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — Fourth Circuit (public domain, 17 U.S.C. § 105):https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/OAarchive/mp3/25-4242-20260918.mp3
Argument date, docket and counsel — Fourth Circuit:https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/oral-argument/oral-argument-audio-files
Appellate docket — PACER-derived Justia mirror:https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca4/25-4242
Neder v. United States, harmless-error rule — U.S. Supreme Court:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-527/pdf/USREPORTS-527-1.pdf

0:00
0:00