⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

James Robertson v. The Boeing Company — 4th Cir. (Oct 28, 2026)

No. 25-2313 Argued October 28, 2026 Published October 30, 2026

The Fourth Circuit hears James Robertson’s military-employment dispute with Boeing. Robertson was a military reservist and a fleet-planning analyst at Boeing. He says complaints about military absences led to his removal from the Hawaiian Airlines account in 2017. He argues that this damaged his career and contributed to his layoff seven years later. Boeing says performance problems and a companywide reduction in force explain its decisions. Robertson sued under USERRA, a federal law protecting workers against discrimination based on military service. The district judge ruled for Boeing without a trial, finding insufficient evidence of service-based discrimination. Robertson now appeals. The questions include whether the account assignment was a protected employment benefit, whether military service motivated its loss, and whether it caused the later harm. Joseph Wilkinson will argue for Robertson.

James Robertson v. The Boeing Company (No. 25-2313) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, argued October 28, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — official Fourth Circuit recording, October 28, 2026:https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/OAarchive/mp3/25-2313-20261028.mp3
Official argument listing and case-specific audio row:https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/oral-argument/oral-argument-audio-files
Official Fourth Circuit calendar — October 28, 2026, page 6:https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/cal/internetcalOct272026.pdf
Written appellate docket and counsel appearances — No. 25-2313:https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca4/25-2313
USERRA anti-discrimination provision — 38 U.S.C. § 4311:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/4311
USERRA definitions — 38 U.S.C. § 4303:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/4303
No limitations period for USERRA actions — 38 U.S.C. § 4327(b):https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/4327
Laches — 20 C.F.R. § 1002.311:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/20/1002.311
Laches and statutes of limitations — Petrella majority, Parts III and IV-A–B:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/572/663/

0:00
0:00