Deanna Effland v. Baltimore Police Department — 4th Cir. (Oct 29, 2026)
The Fourth Circuit hears Deanna Effland's employment retaliation case against the Baltimore Police Department. Effland alleges that complaints about sexual harassment led to her demotion, lower pay, and unwarranted discipline over a parking-garage accident. She also challenges the city's opposition to her workers' compensation claim. The district court treated the demotion challenge as too late, rejected her remaining claims without a trial, and later refused to reopen the judgment. The main debate concerns the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which treats each paycheck affected by unlawful compensation discrimination as a new event for filing an agency charge. The question is whether that rule reaches her reduced pay from an allegedly retaliatory demotion. The lawyers will also discuss an adoptive admission: a statement a party accepts as true, allowing it to be used against that party. Effland will ask the court to treat the department's silence on some allegations that way; the department will oppose that treatment. Another issue is whether the judge relied on a defense raised too late in briefing.
Deanna Effland v. Baltimore Police Department (No. 25-2245) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, argued October 29, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction