⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Laurenzano v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue — 4th Cir. (Sep 16, 2026)

No. 25-2020 Argued September 16, 2026 Published September 26, 2026

Peter Laurenzano took a proposed income-tax bill to the U.S. Tax Court. His petition came after the 90-day deadline, and that court dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction without deciding the tax dispute. He now asks the Fourth Circuit to hold that the deadline does not take away the Tax Court's power to hear a late petition. He also seeks a chance to argue for equitable tolling, a narrow exception for late filings in extraordinary circumstances; whether he qualifies would be a separate question. The Commissioner says the deadline is strict and cannot be extended this way. The Supreme Court allowed equitable tolling under a different Tax Court deadline in Boechler; these judges will decide what that means for this one.

Laurenzano v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (No. 25-2020) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, argued September 16, 2026.

0:00
0:00