⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company v. Tilma, Inc. — 4th Cir. (Sep 15, 2026)

No. 25-1980 Argued September 15, 2026 Published September 30, 2026

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit hears Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company versus Tilma, Incorporated. In an earlier lawsuit, a woman alleged that sex traffickers exploited her from 2012 to 2014 at a Chesapeake, Virginia hotel operated by Tilma. She alleged the hotel ignored warning signs; that lawsuit later settled. Tilma's insurers then asked a federal court to declare that their policies required neither a legal defense nor payment of the settlement. The district court disagreed, finding that the policy's coverage for false detention or imprisonment could apply to the allegations. The appeal asks whether the allegations trigger a duty to defend and, separately, whether the insurers must pay the settlement. Under Virginia law, a potentially covered allegation can trigger a defense even if liability has not been proved.

Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company v. Tilma, Inc. (No. 25-1980) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, argued September 15, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (public domain, 17 U.S.C. § 105):https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/OAarchive/mp3/25-1980-20260915.mp3
Argument listing — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit:https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/oral-argument/oral-argument-audio-files
Coverage opinion — U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Justia mirror):https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/virginia/vaedce/2:2024cv00492/558354/49
Underlying lawsuit opinion — U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Justia mirror):https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/virginia/vaedce/2:2024cv00204/551336/64/
Christopher M. Seelie — Kaufman & Canoles:https://www.kaufcan.com/professionals

0:00
0:00