⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS

Ricardo Hernandez-Mendez v. Todd Blanche — 4th Cir. (Sep 15, 2026)

No. 25-1648 Argued September 15, 2026 Published September 28, 2026

The Fourth Circuit hears Ricardo Hernandez-Mendez's immigration appeal. He faces removal to El Salvador and says his visible gang tattoos make detention and torture there more likely. An immigration judge found he would probably be tortured there and granted him protection under the Convention Against Torture. The Board of Immigration Appeals reversed that ruling. A second, consolidated petition asks whether the Board should have reopened the case to consider new evidence. The judges now consider whether the Board improperly reweighed the immigration judge's factual prediction and whether it fairly handled the new evidence.

Ricardo Hernandez-Mendez v. Todd Blanche (No. 25-1648) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, argued September 15, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (public domain, 17 U.S.C. § 105):https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/OAarchive/mp3/25-1648-20260915.mp3
Argument listing — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit:https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/oral-argument/oral-argument-audio-files
Appellate docket 25-1648 — PACER-derived Justia record:https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca4/25-1648
Consolidated appellate docket 25-2410 — PACER-derived Justia record:https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca4/25-2410

0:00
0:00