⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

William Dickerson v. Joel Anderson — 4th Cir. (Sep 16, 2026)

No. 25-0004 Argued September 16, 2026 Published October 4, 2026

The Fourth Circuit hears Dickerson's challenge to the denial of federal habeas relief in a South Carolina death-penalty case. In 2006, a man was tortured to death in a Charleston-area apartment. A jury convicted Dickerson of murder, kidnapping and sexual assault, and he was sentenced to death in 2009. His state appeals and post-conviction proceedings did not overturn those convictions or the death sentence. The federal district court then rejected his habeas petition, which challenged his imprisonment and sentence under federal law. Dickerson says the prosecutor excluded Black jurors because of their race. Batson is the Supreme Court rule forbidding race-based jury strikes. A central dispute is whether procedural barriers prevent federal review of that discrimination claim and evidence obtained after trial. The lawyers also distinguish a claim against the prosecutor's jury strikes from a claim that Dickerson's defense lawyers handled the objection ineffectively. The appeal separately concerns access to prosecutors' notes about possible promises of leniency to witnesses. David Weiss will seek further review for Dickerson; the state will defend the denial of relief.

William Dickerson v. Joel Anderson (No. 25-0004) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, argued September 16, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — Fourth Circuit (court original):https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/OAarchive/mp3/25-0004-20260916.mp3
Argument date, case and counsel — Fourth Circuit listing:https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/oral-argument/oral-argument-audio-files
Trial facts and direct appeal — State v. Dickerson, South Carolina Supreme Court, October 3, 2011:https://www.sccourts.org/media/opinions/HTMLFiles/SC/27048.htm
Independent trial reporting and sentence — WCSC, May 7, 2009:https://www.live5news.com/story/10322671/jury-hands-down-death-sentence-in-dickerson-trial/
Federal habeas ruling and procedural history — district court, September 24, 2024, document 112 (actual opinion reproduced by Justia):https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/south-carolina/scdce/9:2022cv00108/269281/112/
State-prisoner federal habeas review — 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (statutory text, Cornell LII):https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2254
Race-based jury strikes — Batson v. Kentucky, Supreme Court majority, 1986 (Cornell LII reproduction):https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/476/79
Independent and adequate grounds, cause and prejudice — Coleman v. Thompson, Supreme Court majority, 1991 (Cornell LII reproduction):https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/501/722
Cause for procedural default — Murray v. Carrier, Supreme Court majority, 1986 (Cornell LII reproduction):https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/477/478
Disclosure of favorable material evidence — Brady v. Maryland, Supreme Court majority, 1963 (Cornell LII reproduction):https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/373/83
Material evidence affecting witness credibility — Giglio v. United States, Supreme Court majority, 1972 (Cornell LII reproduction):https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/405/150

0:00
0:00