US v. Covia Smith — 4th Cir. (Oct 30, 2026)
The Fourth Circuit considers whether a prisoner's lawyers should have challenged his career-offender classification. A jury convicted him of distributing marijuana and cocaine, and he received a twenty-five-year federal sentence. The career-offender classification raised his recommended sentencing range based on earlier convictions. Those qualifying earlier convictions are called predicates; the classification affects sentencing, not the criminal charges themselves. This is a postconviction challenge to legal representation, not a new trial of the drug charges. Ineffective assistance requires unreasonable performance and a reasonable probability of a different result without the lawyer's errors. The work must be judged using the law and circumstances at the time, not hindsight. You will also hear Rule sixty b: a limited way to seek relief from an earlier judgment.
US v. Covia Smith (No. 24-6528) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, argued October 30, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction