⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

In Re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 — 2d Cir. (Oct 7, 2026)

No. 26-666 Argued October 7, 2026 Published October 10, 2026

The Second Circuit hears an appeal in the September 11 litigation involving judgments against Iran. Several groups of plaintiffs had obtained judgments in cases handled together in the Southern District of New York. The district court later certified Iran judgments as final under Rule 54(b) and authorized their registration in the Eastern District of New York. When a case has multiple claims or parties, Rule 54(b) allows a court to enter a final judgment on fewer than all of them, but only if it expressly finds no just reason for delay.

In Re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (No. 26-666) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, argued October 7, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — Second Circuit:https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/audio/26-666.mp3
Argument date and docket — Official Second Circuit recording listing:https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/oral_arguments.html
Prior Iran-judgment certification and registration — Daniels order, April 1, 2026:https://app.midpage.ai/document/smith-v-the-islamic-emirate--26347602-0cca-4011-9284-ea9ce188e1e9
Rule 54(b) — Current Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, page 80:https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/federal-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf

0:00
0:00