⚖ Oral Arguments, with Context

Real court arguments, crisp audio, with context.

Court recordings can be difficult to follow, and many suffer from poor audio quality. This podcast enhances the audio, provides a brief introduction to each case, and explains legal concepts that may be unfamiliar to some listeners.

We hope these enhancements make oral argument recordings easier to understand, more accessible, and more enjoyable to listen to.

Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube /feed.xml Open RSS Status

United States v. Turnick — 2d Cir. (Oct 19, 2026)

No. 25-437 Argued October 19, 2026 Published October 23, 2026

The Second Circuit hears Justin Turnick's appeal of a federal prison sentence. His drug case arose from sales of narcotics to people he knew. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced in federal district court. For context, criminal history points classify a defendant's prior record and help determine the sentencing range under the federal Sentencing Guidelines. Some lesser offenses count only under specified conditions, such as the length of the earlier sentence. Application notes are the Sentencing Commission's commentary explaining the Guidelines, distinct from the guideline text. One note says convictions for driving while intoxicated or under the influence, and similar offenses, are always counted. The interaction between that commentary and the text is central to the discussion you will hear. The pre-sentence report, usually called the P.S.R., is prepared by probation for the judge.

United States v. Turnick (No. 25-437) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, argued October 19, 2026.

Sources
Argument audio — official Second Circuit recording:https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/audio/25-437.mp3
Independent defense memorandum excerpts — Patch sentencing report, February 21, 2025:https://patch.com/new-york/midhudsonvalley/fentanyl-deaths-lead-prison-drug-dealer
Criminal history and commentary — 2024 Guidelines, chapter 4, sections 4A1.1 and 4A1.2:https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines-manual/2024/CHAPTER_4.pdf
Earlier impaired-driving interpretation — Potes-Castillo, 2011 opinion; later commentary changes disputed here:https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/07-5518/07-5518_opn-2011-03-27.pdf?ts=1410917748
Pre-sentence report — Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c) and (d):https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_32

0:00
0:00