United States of America v. Austin — 2d Cir. (Sep 2, 2026)
The Second Circuit hears Eugene Austin's appeal from three conspiracy convictions arising from an investment fraud that caused over twelve million dollars in losses. He challenges tax evidence and the procedure and length of his eighteen-year sentence. Substantive reasonableness asks whether a sentence falls outside the range the trial judge could permissibly choose. Peter J. Tomao of the Law Office of Peter J. Tomao represents Austin. He will argue that the tax evidence was irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial, and that the judge relied on improper considerations and imposed an excessive sentence. Two days after argument, the court affirmed the judgment in a nonprecedential summary order.
United States of America v. Austin (No. 25-1093) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, argued September 2, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 10:19Olga Zverovich — United States