Alejandro Roche, Appellant v. TECO Energy, Inc., et al. — 11th Cir. (argued August 14, 2026)
The Eleventh Circuit considers whether TECO Energy had to warn retirement-plan participants that rising interest rates could sharply reduce pension lump sums. Alejandro Roche worked for TECO for about thirty-three years. He planned to retire in December 2022, but the plan's ninety-day notice rule moved his payment into January, cutting his estimate from about four hundred eighty-three thousand dollars to about three hundred ninety-seven thousand. Roche says ERISA, the federal law governing employee benefit plans, imposed duties of loyalty and care that required a warning. TECO says it followed the law's specific disclosure rules and had no duty to offer unsolicited financial advice. The district court dismissed Roche's proposed class action with prejudice.
Alejandro Roche, Appellant v. TECO Energy, Inc., et al. (No. 25-12050) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, argued August 14, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:16Advocate — Eva T. Cantarella
- 20:01Advocate — René E. Thorne