United States v. Alexander — 10th Cir. (Sep 17, 2026)
The Tenth Circuit hears Thomas Brooks Alexander's sentencing appeal. His federal case involved fraud and identity theft, but at sentencing a separate armed robbery became central to the guideline calculation. The district court treated the robbery and firearm as relevant conduct, increasing the advisory range through adjustments for loss and use of a firearm. Relevant conduct lets a sentencing court count connected acts beyond the offense of conviction. When another person's acts are used, they must fall within the jointly undertaken activity, further it, and be reasonably foreseeable. The appeal asks whether the robbery could properly count against Alexander.
United States v. Alexander (No. 25-5182) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, argued September 17, 2026.
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:34Advocate — Matthew J. Primm
- 16:42Advocate — Elliot Anderson